Friday, May 8, 2009

Wednesday, May 6, 2009

evaluation

Questionnaire feedback

1. What does the title suggest to you? 
there answers for this question are fairly similar. everyone who was questioned thought the Title advertised a rock/metal magazine. 

2. What genre/type of music does the magazine focus on and how do you know this? 
All my answers showed that my magazine suggested that the genre focused on metal/heavy metal. some participants also noticed hints of punk. 

3. What makes the magazine look professional/unprofessional? 
I have evaluated that the layout, title and text layout make the magazine look professional but the black boxes round the txt will make the magazine look a little unprofessional

4. How genuine does the front cover look?
Everyone says it looks very genuine with the odd exceptional criticism

5. Do the contents of the page simply inform or does it also manage to interest you into reading the rest of the magazine?
most of my audience believe the contents to inform. some people believe it to have too little information whereas some people believe it to have too much. some people have commented that it is quite interesting and would read on. 

6. Does the article sound like a piece of journalism?
i have been told that my article sounds very a very professional piece of journalism. 

7. Does the article layout make you want to read it? if not why? 
I have been told it its quite interesting to read and is well set out. once again there is the odd comment were i am told my colour scheme does not work or i have too much content in my article. 

edits

to make my magazine seem more professional, i had to edit the pictures so they did not look blocky on my magazine. i made sure they fit with the article and other pages without looking out of place.  





































these pictures are used  in my final product. they are what are going to contribute to my final marks